I mean… that was stupid, top to bottom, I think all that makes him not that bright, undercuts his image, and makes his company look more idiotic than I imagined possible for something so successful, but it doesn’t really make him a bad person in the way I feel someone like Logan Paul is. It’s not on the same level as something like a crypto rug pull.

Haha, agreed, the two are contradictory, I don’t think it’s a very stable or effective worldview. You can see how stuff like Alpha Male comes out of that. “If women only like badasses who are mean to them, I’ll deliberately be a badass who’s mean to women”. I’ve heard it said that the best advice for an incel is to just… find a real hobby, work on yourself, find some real happiness and become an interesting person who’s not obsessed with women and sex, and maybe you’ll cross paths with someone who might genuinely like you down the line. And that advice definitely checks out, blaming women for everything wrong in your life isn’t a way to attract anyone, but they tend to misdiagnose the problem. Definitely not a fun rabbit hole.

Anyway, happy I could help out! Enjoy your new cursed internet knowledge.

I’m surprised you feel you need that much. Personally, I’m tinkering on a 7900XTX, with 24Gb of VRAM. I can’t run the massive new models, like the latest Deepseek Flash at 400+ Gb, but neither can 192Gb. Means my context isn’t unlimited, but I’m able to run even big local models like Qwen3.8 at Q4_K_M with a context of 64K, which is enough when paired with a front end like Hermes that can run compaction and invoke subagents. Honestly, I’d describe 24Gb as a sweet spot for local AI usage, 32Gb sounds like comfortable headroom for a larger context window, or even multiple heads.

To be fair, I guess it is unified memory, and it doesn’t sound like you’re running it on a dedicated machine, so maybe the other stuff you’re running is pushing past 8Gb and giving you less space for AI than me. But 128Gb still sounds like wild excess to me, well into the diminishing returns of slightly more accurate rounding and needlessly large context.

Oh, interesting. Looking at your comment history, I’ll give you the benefit of a doubt that you’re unaware of incel subculture.

On its face, you’re right that the term is fine, involuntary celibate should mean something like “single”, or maybe “virgin”, which I wouldn’t use as an insult either. In practice however, those who self-identify as incels tend to be extreme, and have a lot of hate for women. It’s like an extremist version of the “girls always pick the bad boys, nice guys finish last” ideology. They’re also the origin of other harmful ideas, like “Alpha/Beta/Sigma male” culture, the kind that someone like Andrew Tate takes advantage of.

So to go back to the suffix, which I described as “someone obsessed with something”, it’s referring to this obsession with sex and hating women in a derogatory way, which is much more deserving of mockery than just being celibate.

I think in this case the origin of “-cel” is a portmanteau, but its usage has shifted to a suffix. “Codecel” isn’t a portmanteau of “coder celibate”, it’s become a mockery of incels to use it as a suffix for “loser who’s obsessed with this thing”.