Don’t worry, I’m here as long as you need me best buddy 🤎
- 0 Posts
- 13 Comments
- HeHoXa@lemmy.ziptoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.world•Would you use a website that required a browser extension to uphold end-to-end encryption of user content?1·2 hours ago
- HeHoXa@lemmy.ziptoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.world•Would you use a website that required a browser extension to uphold end-to-end encryption of user content?11·15 hours ago
You remember earlier when you said, “Still going,” like it was absurd?
💩
It’s alright, a career in tech isn’t for everyone. Imm sure you have plenty of great skills
- HeHoXa@lemmy.ziptoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.world•Would you use a website that required a browser extension to uphold end-to-end encryption of user content?12·17 hours ago
💩 i get it, it’s hard being so wrong and you really need a W from SOME angle
- HeHoXa@lemmy.ziptoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.world•Would you use a website that required a browser extension to uphold end-to-end encryption of user content?12·17 hours ago
Sure they can. By messaging a native tool. Pedantic 💩
- HeHoXa@lemmy.ziptoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.world•Would you use a website that required a browser extension to uphold end-to-end encryption of user content?02·20 hours ago
All nonsense aside I recognize you were trying to be helpful in your own way.
I don’t much care for that way but bear you no genuine ill will and wish you the best.
💩
- HeHoXa@lemmy.ziptoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.world•Would you use a website that required a browser extension to uphold end-to-end encryption of user content?02·20 hours ago
💩
For posterity, my original edit was in before his first comment.
So full of it
- HeHoXa@lemmy.ziptoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.world•Would you use a website that required a browser extension to uphold end-to-end encryption of user content?02·20 hours ago
It is he thing I suggested from the start.
I already get you’re full of it. You don’t have to jeep selling me
- HeHoXa@lemmy.ziptoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.world•Would you use a website that required a browser extension to uphold end-to-end encryption of user content?01·21 hours ago
💩 semantic distinctions, extensions can run whatever when you register the logic in advance, as suggested in my first comment
- HeHoXa@lemmy.ziptoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.world•Would you use a website that required a browser extension to uphold end-to-end encryption of user content?0·21 hours ago
… 3 years ago ish?
I tried to clarify with the edit, you’re sorta right, it wasn’t a system command. It was “native messaging”
But you’re sort of full of it too, as you can use this native messaging to execute arbitrary logic. Nobody said you don’t need a manifest, and someone did say you needed a group policy entry too
Get ready for it to suck. Embrace the pain like a masochist.
Currently seems like you have a pretty solid routine of wasting days on YT. While it may be long term painful, it’s short term very pleasant, and it’s gonna be hard to force yourself to do anything less pleasant.
Gotta expect the suck and treat the feeling as progress.
Or substitution for other dopamine dumps, but that’s just making a new future problem
- HeHoXa@lemmy.ziptoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.world•Would you use a website that required a browser extension to uphold end-to-end encryption of user content?11·1 day ago
Extensions can have more access.
They can snoop / manipulate across tabs or even scan the local drive and execute system commands… when given the access.
I had to make one for work once to let a web app run a legacy command prompt system. The web app’s search was better, but the users wanted to edit with the old tool.
It was kind of interesting the way it worked. Not remembering the full details, I created an extension and a batch script and had to register the batch script with a group policy and declare the extension’s permission to run that batch script
Then the users could search a client in the web app and press a button to bring up their profile in the prompt app.
Not a recommended approach for public facing apps.
*Edit: No! It wasn’t a batch script… exactly… it was a C# app compiled to .dll that accepted client id as an argument
Universe train, universe train. Size of the entire universe train. Usually kind to smaller train. Universe train