I don’t think I was suggesting that being a billionaire causes you to be pedophile, or the other way around.
Do all statements that do not forward some sort of effort to reason through things count as backwards?
Can you explain why you think it’s backwards? It may be hyperbolic and facetious, but I think recent history has shown a statistically significant correlation between the ultra-wealthy and pedophilia.
I’ve always said that the biggest difference between a billionaire on a yatch and a homeless man with a cart of garbage is luck.
All billionaires are pedophiles
I’m so pumped for rest in piss day. I hope it comes soon
It should come with a warning to keep it away from kids and pets though
Its all just flirtation, cheesy insincere flirtation, but flirtation nonetheless.
Correlation does not imply causation, even a 100% correlation. So no, I am not saying that being a billionaire makes you a pedophile, or the other way around. But rather than the mindset that lows one to amass that amount of wealth is also an ingredient in amoral behavior, vis-à-vis island-activities.
I’m all for being nuanced when having a detailed nuanced discussion, but internet comments are not a good place for nuanced discussion.