• cb900f_bodhi@fedinsfw.app
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m not sure why you’re getting down votes for this. Isn’t having some redundancy or backup plan a good idea? What am I missing here?

    • ChubbyHot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Likely because the coal plant was set to retire anyway. No point in paying someone millions to keep this coal plant as a backup for rare events.

      The Power company will have contingencies and the national grid to rely on, which are cheaper than keeping an old coal plant warm.