How would they found anybody who did not hate insurance companies? And now they a painting him like a good family and such when is wasn’t even anything close.?
How would they found anybody who did not hate insurance companies? And now they a painting him like a good family and such when is wasn’t even anything close.?
Because the prosecution has dna, fingerprints, video, manifesto.
The prosecution also has a non-contiguous chain of custody on the core pieces of physical evidence. And the video, to my eyes, and without hyperbole, does not show the individual they claim it does.
My hypothesis on the origin of this development is that the defense knew the DoJ is refusing to play by the rules, and that this was the least bad alternative in a legal tactical sense.
Weak sauce. Pre-trial suppression rulings determined that the core physical evidence—including the 3D-printed firearm, suppressor, and handwritten notebook—was legally obtained during subsequent police station processing
Neckbeards can downvote the facts all they want lmao