Right - I see the other topic has been locked / author hasn’t returned to follow community rules.

Here’s the original topic https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49003386

and a measured (IMHO) response to it. (BTW, do your self a favour and change tabs with that site open :)

https://マリウス.com/i-regret-migrating-to-codeberg/

It’s a tough spot, Codeberg has found themselves in and I wish them luck. But beyond that, this is (yet) another reminder that in 2026, if you don’t self host it, the cloud is just someone else computer

  • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    before reading the blog post I was thinking the same. now I don’t.

    the worst of the LLM projects have no place on codeberg that’s for sure, but there would have been better ways than a blanket ban to limit the resource consumption of LLM and crypto projects. codeberg already has a storage quota system, they could be giving a lower quota for LLM projects, maybe also disable free CI for them, which I am a bit surprised they have given. and solve the reputation problem with banners. but no, total blanket ban based on feelings, it is.

    • poVoq@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      If the hard legal reality of all LLM generated code having a high risk of breaking copyright is “feelings” for you, then sure 🙄