openmic.social is an uncensored community. You may encounter strong language, controversial opinions, and mature or NSFW material. You must be 18+ to browse. Illegal content is prohibited and removed on sight — please report it. By continuing, you accept that you may see content you personally disagree with.
Weird AI disclosure:
https://store.steampowered.com/app/2366590/Rideshare_Stimulator/
Why would you put in things that specifically are not AI in an AI disclosure?
Is that normal?
The questionnaire first asks you if AI was used yes/no, and if you say yes it then asks you to describe in detail how and for what, and for many devs the first thing to do is to try to highlight all the important parts that it wasn’t.
You have convinced me. 👍
This would make any game immediately 3 points better on the scale of 10.
They’ve said they’re working on an “infinite” slop mode where the conversations are AI-generated.
They used to have no AI disclosure, and people had to learn about them using AI through that disgruntled writer’s story.
So now given the very mature CEO answer, I’m assuming they’re butthurt that some people want to know about their AI use, and they’re using the disclosure to claim that part of their game is not AI instead.
Also your comment made me briefly wonder why someone got Weird Al’s comment on the subject, and it was a bit funny.
maybe because it’s not true, at least if what the ex-head writer said on bsky is to be believed.
It reeks of dishonesty. Very clearly they used AI, just not VERY SPECIFICALLY for the thing they were accused of firing a person over?