openmic.social is an uncensored community. You may encounter strong language, controversial opinions, and mature or NSFW material. You must be 18+ to browse. Illegal content is prohibited and removed on sight — please report it. By continuing, you accept that you may see content you personally disagree with.
The entire point of the meme is that both options do the same exact thing while acting differently to the public eye. If the meme intended to show a difference in policy or behavior it would have. That is the core of the argument being made, not an irrelevant detail.
I disagree but I don’t think anyone will accept that my interpretation of the meme is correct because I didn’t make it. So I made a different one where I can say with authority what the intent is.
Right, that’s what I’m saying. The point the meme is making is that there is no policy difference. You’re disagreeing with the other guy’s interpretation here, not mine.
They are also drawn with speech bubbles demonstrating their differences.
Which does not include any concrete difference in policy
How detailed does a meme have to be?
The entire point of the meme is that both options do the same exact thing while acting differently to the public eye. If the meme intended to show a difference in policy or behavior it would have. That is the core of the argument being made, not an irrelevant detail.
I disagree but I don’t think anyone will accept that my interpretation of the meme is correct because I didn’t make it. So I made a different one where I can say with authority what the intent is.
Does this avoid the flaws you see here?
LGTM
Yeah funny, i wonder why that is
Right, that’s what I’m saying. The point the meme is making is that there is no policy difference. You’re disagreeing with the other guy’s interpretation here, not mine.