• SlurpingPus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Meanwhile stupid USians subscribe to the literal 19th-century ‘scientific racism’ theory that has ‘Caucasian people’ as something other than deeply tan skin that Caucasian people actually have.

          • SlurpingPus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            So you’re implying that Middle Persian ‘*Kaf kōf’ is halfway the same as Mycenaean Greek 𐀀𐀯𐀹𐀊 ‘a-si-wi-ja’ or /⁠aswijaː⁠/? Do you have any evidence to support your claim?

              • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 hours ago

                Point away, you completely missed mine. “Caucasian” means “from the Caucasus”, “Asian” means “from Asia”. It’s a coincidence that “Caucasian” has the word “Asian” in it, they’re not from the same root words. Otherwise, either Asia would be called Asus or the Caucasus would be called the Caucasia. Look up the word “etymology”, I don’t think you understand the concept.

                • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  Well Caucasian wouldnt be nearly as impactful as a word if it weren’t for the USA.

                  Most of it’s use comes from the creation of a ‘white race’ for use in politics/law/oppression/dehumanization.

                  And when that stuff began, remember the Italians, Irish, and many other now ‘white’ people were not considered ‘white’. So being called European was out. Had to try and find a word that excluded the mediteranian peoples, since the bulk of wealth and power were mainly English, French, Germanic, and Dutch.

                  Note: and the people mainly responsible for the caucasian misnomering were not from Scandanavia and had yet to conflate ‘white supremacy’ with Aryans. And thus yet to describe ideal Aryans using Scandanavian features.

                  • SlurpingPus@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 hour ago

                    Wrong again, US boy. ‘Caucasian’ actually included most of Asia, since ‘Mongoloid’ only properly described East-Asians like the Chinese, Mongols, Siberian natives etc. Indians and Arabs (i.e.Aryans) were included in ‘Caucasians’, although the definition was debated.

                    Also, the ‘scientific racism’ theory was thought up at the University of Göttingen in Germany, when the US was just a few years old.