• Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    19 days ago

    So the other 99% of the energy that doesn’t push push against the craft body just goes away?

    You’re missing the insane energy density of a nuclear reaction. The first nuke used in war weighed 4700kg and produced about 88 terajoules of energy. That’s about 19 giga joule per kilo

    1 kg of rocketfuel + oxidizer produces 13 megajoule.

    So even at 1% energy conversion for a nuke and 100% conversion for rocketfuel, the nuke is still 15 times more energydense.

    And if you don’t use nukes from the 40s, a modern thermonuclear bomb packs 2000TJ into 200 kilos, for a convenient 10TJ per kilo, or 7700 times more power per kilo than liquid rocket fuel.

    • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 days ago

      Also the actual propulsive force would have been more like 50%, not 90. So more like almost 400,000x more power per kilo than liquid rocket fuel.