• WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    there is no practical difference. as someone going their way on the street, you have no way to figure out what is happening with the recording the camera takes. you cannot determine if its processed locally, uploaded right to a data broker, or if it is stored locally temporarily for it to be uploaded later.

    • Riskable@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yep. And?

      Just like today: You have no idea if that person has a hidden camera or a gun or anything else dangerous or what their intentions are.

      • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        and that’s why local models don’t solve any problems with smart glasses. the only solution is to make wearing such hidden or not recording devices a criminal offence. to deter people from trying to do it. also make it know n to the people by making examples out of a few offenders, maybe staged.

        • undrwater@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Another solution would be to make centralized facial recognition systems illegal.

          That way, you can still carry your phone around and not be charged with “concealed carry of a camera”.

          • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            yeah, then meta moves to process the video on your phone when it gets the chance, and upload the results to themselves.

            That way, you can still carry your phone around and not be charged with “concealed carry of a camera”.

            its strange because we usually don’t take it that way, but that is actually concealed carry of a camera

        • Riskable@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          Your arguments are all against cameras recording people in public. That has nothing at all to do with AI. Local or not.

          Local AI models do solve the privacy issue of everyone and everything being recorded, classified, and becoming permanently searchable for Meta and via any request they get from law enforcement, sketchy government entities, or anyone that’s willing to pay for it.

          • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Local AI models do solve the privacy issue of everyone and everything being recorded, classified, and becoming permanently searchable

            no they don’t. a) I don’t know if you’re giving the data to meta or the fbi or your local pedo ring. b) stop recording people without their fucking consent you chud

            • Riskable@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              WTF? Local models run on your local hardware without an Internet connection. Hence, they’re not giving any data to anyone except you.

              • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                the privacy issue

                what part of ME, NOT TRUSTING YOU, trusting your shifty, creepy ass with my ‘privacy’ ain’t you fucking getting?

                • Riskable@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  So you don’t trust individuals with cameras but you trust the government and businesses with them. Got it.

                  • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    who the fuck told you I trust the government? like, fuck flock too,

                    bwahahaha.

                    but no I don’t trust chuds, like you, who want everyone to wear cameras. get bent.

          • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Your arguments are all against cameras recording people in public. That has nothing at all to do with AI. Local or not.

            yes, and this whole post is about cameras recording people in public. not AI. you then said local AI is the solution. then I said it is not a solution.

            Local AI models do solve the privacy issue of everyone and everything being recorded

            they don’t, because again, nobody can tell if that person is using local AI, or if they are collecting data for uploading later.