openmic.social is an uncensored community. You may encounter strong language, controversial opinions, and mature or NSFW material. You must be 18+ to browse. Illegal content is prohibited and removed on sight — please report it. By continuing, you accept that you may see content you personally disagree with.
Tolerance ends with the intolerant. I would not protect Tate from any of the harm he inflicted upon others.
An eye for an eye is rarely a good exchange rate.
If I ever become Supreme Ruler of Earth, I’ll make this phrase literal.
What if they have better eyes than me? What if it’s my chance at better vision? Do they even need to read??
… Gimme eyes pls.
GIMME FUEL, GIMME FIRE, GIMME EYES WHICH I DESIRE!
Tate is getting what none of his victims got: due process and a chance at reform. Part of that process is going to be forming Empathy, a word meaning “to suffer together with others”.
Why would his victims need that? They’re not the ones who need due process or have reason to reform. 🤨
Short reply? No.