• BigMacHole@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Smart glasses are COOL! Why are you so BUTTHURT about Docturs and Social Media giants with DISTURBING and NONEXISTANT Privacy Practices seeing your PRIVATE NAKED VIDEOS? Stupid LIBTARDS!

    -People in this Thread!

    • Taleya@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Every damned thread about them hurr huu but what about smartfonez as if some turd whipping out their smartphone to film someone wasn’t such an acknowleged shit move it’s a tv trope.

    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      so fucking sick and tired of the pervert glasses boosters.

      these things belong on people with visual difficulty, the visual description service should be free to them, and the devices restricted otherwise. it’s fucking gross that so many people think ‘you have no reasonable expectation to privacy in the public’ == creep cameras are cool.

      fyi, there are laws in most states against voyeurism - in my state that creep behavior is a felony.

      https://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=9A.44.115

      so fucking sick of the creepglass fanboys

      • LilBobbyTables@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Strong disagree. Smart glasses will be one of the biggest tech advances in the next decade or 2 for the normal person, and I’m here for it. The awesome things that they will unlock the ability to do are almost unlimited.

        There are a million cheap, easy to get and conceal cameras that perverts have access to. There are already laws around where and when and what you can record. Smart glasses don’t make anything any easier for perverts.

        All that’s needed is a standard to be developed on how to physically cover the camera by default, and make it extremely obvious when the camera is not covered, even if it’s not recording. Shouldn’t be hard technically.

        • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          You don’t care that people will find you creepy?

          Like, I get it if you think you’d never do awful things, sure, but being perceived as someone in that same crowd?

          Huh

          Also, equating these to a phone camera, a pen camera or other device is specious as shit. ‘spy cams’ often have terrible resolution; these things do not. LOL get a minox it’s the same. derp.

          also, none of your concealable cameras are RUNNING FUCKIN FACIAL RECOGNITION OR OTHER AI GARBAGE they’re certain to make for these shitspecs.

          re: a standard - if it wasn’t hard technically to do so, why do you think they neglected to do it?

          because the creeps who will buy these don’t want that shit.

          https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/us/tiktok-sellers-show-how-to-disable-meta-smart-glasses-privacy-light/articleshow/123133545.cms

          • LilBobbyTables@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            I wouldn’t be wearing them anywhere that would be considered “creepy” to wear them, and as a middle aged heavily tattooed metal fan I’m long past caring what other people think haha.

            I’m not planning on buying any yet either - the tech that I’m waiting for isn’t there yet. I want all the AR stuff, maps, live translations, the ability to look at something and get info about it, do price comparisons, get instructions, etc. basically the next iteration of Microsoft’s HoloLens or Apples Vision Pro, but in normal glasses. By then the large majority of the population will have gotten over this “only perverts wear them” thing, which is quite frankly silly anyway.

            The resolution of creep cams is irrelevant really (I’m sure there are many 1080p and 4K ones though), since the fact that it’s being recorded at all is the issue. Walking around with smart glasses on at least makes it obvious that you could be going to record.

            As for the standard - it won’t be up to the manufacturers eventually. It’ll be regulated. I’m all for that. The EU commission will do something about it soon, though at the same time they’ll probably mandate all footage and data gets sent to law enforcement and governments since they seem to tick-tock between good and horrible actions haha

            • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              large majority of the population will have gotten over this “only perverts wear them” thing, which is quite frankly silly anyway.

              sure thing buddy.

              imho the people who find these creepy af is only going to grow as awareness of them grows.

              but you do you.

              • LilBobbyTables@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 days ago

                People felt the same way about phone cameras at one stage. You might not be old enough to remember, or might not have even been born.

                Phones in Japan had to be made so you couldn’t disable the shutter sound when taking a photo.

                One thing I’ve really learned over the years is that a huge percentage of the population has virtually no ability to think ahead even a few years in terms of tech, let alone long term. I guarantee you that smart glasses are going to be as ubiquitous as smart phones and smart watches in a decade or 2. They are the natural evolution of the smartphone, or as an everyday wearable.

                • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  dude, I’ve been using phones since they had dials. one place I lived, we had a party line shared with 3 neighbors.

                  it’s not the same thing at all. Stop acting like phones and EYEWEAR are the same. People have no reasonable expectation if you’re holding a phone to their face that they aren’t being recorded. Looking at your silly stupid mug while serving your food or walking by isn’t consenting to be recorded.

                  One thing I’ve really learned over the years is that a huge percentage of the population has virtually no ability to think ahead even a few years in terms of tech,

                  this is rich, considering how out of touch you are on this subject.

                  • LilBobbyTables@lemmy.today
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    Ok so you fundamentally don’t understand that in public places you have no expectation of privacy and can be recorded or photographed without consent in most of the world. You might not like that or agree with it, but that’s how it is.

                    Seems you’re the one who is out of touch.