openmic.social is an uncensored community. You may encounter strong language, controversial opinions, and mature or NSFW material. You must be 18+ to browse. Illegal content is prohibited and removed on sight — please report it. By continuing, you accept that you may see content you personally disagree with.
Well, apparently that’s what a jury overwhelmingly found. So it seems many people can fathom such a medical condition.
A very biased jury, save for one dude.
Biased and corrupt, for sure
Biased by what?
What was the jury m/f ratio?
For clarity, you’re saying it’s not possible for women to be unbiased in the trial of a woman? Why is a man inherently unbiased?
What was the ratio?
He’s not saying that. He’s saying that both are biased and because of that the ratio has to be fifty-fifty.
Why does it need to be 50/50 on this case when that’s not a requirement for other cases?
I personally do think that in any case should be 50/50, so the fact that’s not a requirement for any case it’s what I’m critisizing.