that makes sense. but I can still legislate which actions he and everyone else is capable of legally doing… e.g. collecting data to surveil members of the public.
- 0 Posts
- 4 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
Cake day: July 4th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
- 51dusty@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.world•Flock CEO calls for ‘compromise’ as surveillance company faces growing backlash | TechCrunchEnglish2·18 days ago
- 51dusty@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.world•Flock CEO calls for ‘compromise’ as surveillance company faces growing backlash | TechCrunchEnglish3·18 days ago
I guess that is my confusion.
why would “legislation to be passed that criminalized the usage of personal data for surveillance” fall under this attainer scenario? seems very similar to “legislation passed that criminalized murder”…
- 51dusty@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.world•Flock CEO calls for ‘compromise’ as surveillance company faces growing backlash | TechCrunchEnglish31·18 days ago
wouldn’t a law against murder also be punishing a specific individual or group?
understood. thank you for your patience.