Mastodon: @greg@clar.ke
I disagree, divestment in profitable companies just rewards immoral investors. Plus Zuck has full voting control over Meta so shareholder’s votes mean nothing. I just want Zuck to be held accountable under the existing laws.
So basically no consequences for Zuck abusing a generation of children for profit?
Ads or promotions may also appear during live events streamed on YouTube, such as sporting events.
I don’t have strong opinions but it looks like they’re referring to this phrasing in the ToS which suggests ads will only appear in sporting events. That’s the ToS connection. But otherwise, they advertise YouTube as an ad free experience which just isn’t true.
You can’t advertise one thing and then just add “nah j/k” in the ToS and think you’re off the hook
My argument is that regulation should be designed to prevent immoral behaviour. Otherwise you’re fundamentally taxing morality.