I’d argue that, while there are many - odd - translations (new urban bible, new living translation, new American translation, among others), there are some very good recent academic translations which shouldn’t be included in that. NRSVue and NOAB come to mind as excellent academic translations accessible to the everyday person.

It’s just unfortunate that so many people got duped into this religion by books that were making excuses and purposely translating apologetically.

Christianity is untrue either way, but some recent translations make it far more apparent than others.

Why should they get their interpretation from an apologetic translation written in the 1600s? There are many better versions with more accurate translations and include so many things that have been found since then.

If the context in the KJV was wrong, why shouldn’t it be updated?

Yep. If I’m going out to get a really good steak, I give less than an ounce of a fuck what it comes with.

Ticket prices will in fact go up because they had to spend money on these new planes.

How would they ever recoup their cost? Do you even capitalism bro? (/s)