Me, if I’m being honest.
- 0 Posts
- 10 Comments
- LibertyLizard@slrpnk.nettoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.world•Who needs to stop taking themselves so seriously?11·3 hours ago
- LibertyLizard@slrpnk.nettoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.world•Is allowing nudity the only stable solution to the eternal debate on rules about how people can dress?31·2 days ago
The prohibition on nudity is enforced through the state violence we call policing. So when we’re talking about the decriminalization of nudity, the question is less whether we want people to be nude or not, but rather whether we want this violence to continue. It is an incredible triumph of propaganda that this routine violence has somehow been obfuscated from most people. Your puzzled response is exactly why I needed to bring it up.
Once we see the question with the proper framing, I think the answer is fairly straightforward. Threatening people with violence for not following our fashion rules is ridiculous.
- LibertyLizard@slrpnk.nettoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.world•Do you ever reminisce about an old phone you had in the past?1·3 days ago
No. They’ve all been trash.
- LibertyLizard@slrpnk.nettoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.world•Is allowing nudity the only stable solution to the eternal debate on rules about how people can dress?33·3 days ago
The reason is for people’s psychological comfort. The risk of ass to ass disease transmission is negligible. Far lower than say, a handshake or breathing near someone.
- LibertyLizard@slrpnk.nettoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.world•Is allowing nudity the only stable solution to the eternal debate on rules about how people can dress?22·3 days ago
They are exactly two sides of the same coin. We just think it’s different because we’re indoctrinated into thinking so. Just like people in Islamic countries think the question of whether a woman wears a hijab is way different from whether she wears, say, gloves.
They both were rooted in xenophobia since historically many cultures did not share the same norms around covering body parts as western people did. However, our ethical and fashion norms have been so widely imposed by colonialism that there’s hardly any cultures left who do things differently.
If you read older texts you can see how Europeans saw such cultures. They were widely regarded as animalistic savages. And to the extent that some few indigenous groups still practice their own traditions around body adornment, many people still view them that way today.
- LibertyLizard@slrpnk.nettoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.world•Is allowing nudity the only stable solution to the eternal debate on rules about how people can dress?23·3 days ago
Not really though. But since many people think this it’s probably best practice to just bring something to sit on until people get used to the idea.
- LibertyLizard@slrpnk.nettoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.world•Is allowing nudity the only stable solution to the eternal debate on rules about how people can dress?5·3 days ago
I don’t like the way some people dress as is. But it’s none of my business and trying to ask the government to violently enforce my preferences on other people would be unhinged.
- LibertyLizard@slrpnk.nettoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.world•Are weight-loss drugs technically weapons of mass destruction?1·3 days ago
Doubtful since they decrease appetite, which will decrease carbon emissions far more than the tiny amount your body releases.
- LibertyLizard@slrpnk.nettoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.world•will you join in Halloween night to De-FLOCK your community?32·7 days ago
Eh they can’t be everywhere at once. If there’s no specific location I don’t think it matters too much.
Is there actual evidence it’s dying? For a while it seemed like the momentum was there but now I don’t hear much about mastodon or even bluesky from normies.