Okay this one slaps
ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]
- 2 Posts
- 12 Comments
- ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]@hexbear.nettoMemes@lemmy.ml•If you ask they might just start with the sinophobia again LMBOEnglish312·16 days ago
“You had how many decades of martial law? Whatever, at least you’re not commies.”
Holy shit, two bricks!
Need a big H8 TUNKIES tattoo across my belly
- ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]@hexbear.nettoMemes@lemmy.ml•Unbelievable what CIA psyops projects sayEnglish1·4 months ago
“You’d support Japan in 1942!”
-Someone who supports Banderites in 2026
If the US wasn’t a democracy, then why vote?
It’s wild how people can look at sham elections where both parties serve the same oligarchs in other countries, but then think the biggest oligarchy there is, America, is somehow built different.
But do you mean "then why do people vote, or why should people vote? Cause the answer varies
You get told you’re wrong and immediately throw your toys out the pram
So did you miss the recent bipartisan genocide or…?
- ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]@hexbear.nettoMemes@lemmy.ml•No investigation, no right to speakEnglish1·1 year ago
Got it, content of critque=

Okay okay, for real. You seem to think that because I recognize the necessity of uprooting capitalism, I have nothing positive to replace it with? Cause brother lemme introduce a concept you may have heard of before;

- ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]@hexbear.nettoMemes@lemmy.ml•No investigation, no right to speakEnglish1·1 year ago
That doomer mindset that benefits nobody except the oligarchs, the mindset of…pointing out that the oligarchs are oligarchs? Genuinely confused here. You seem to be interpreting physical observations are some kind of provocative personal statement. Slug and salt physically cannot coexist. Flame and gunpowder physically cannot coexist. Capitalism and a healthy, peaceful living world physically cannot coexist. Pointing this out is no more “hateful” than pointing out that 6 times 7 is 42.
Choosing a hateful side or the other hateful side and never thinking about your own ideas, needs of many, morals and ethics, or your own belief is utter disgrace and folly
The needs of the many is actually our whole thing here, and the thing about the needs of the many is that if you actually take it seriously, what usually happens is that the sideliners who have spent much less time examining the facts will call you hateful for pointing out that the hell empire built on mass-subjugation is unsurprisingly the primary obstacle to the world we want. And that a house with a rotten foundation stands no hope of reconstruction.
While bewildered, I really am trying to approach this openly, which is why ive gone back and softened a couple embarassing redditisms in the edit. So genuinely, and in a spirit of understanding: what is your critique of my assessment?
- ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]@hexbear.nettoMemes@lemmy.ml•No investigation, no right to speakEnglish0·1 year ago
In the case of capitalism that is literally true. Capital will try to destroy any country, culture, ecosystem or set of beliefs that can’t be exploited, or that threaten it’s ability to exploit. It literally is a case of “you have to pick one, and only one can win.” Liveable planet, or capitalism. No other options, no way to avoid the choice. Not choosing is choosing.
I think you’re right, it could slap harder