You mean the minus social credit? How is it racist?
You don’t understand how yet another piece of propaganda made by the most prolific invader in the world against its designated enemies is racist?
Never does it say I side with a prolific invader, or that I condone the credit score system
Why parrot their propaganda, then?
Do you deny that you posted the removed racist meme about credit scores?
“see” where?
You do realise that we can see that you side with the most prolific invader in the world and repeat racist propaganda against their designated enemies, right?
It means far authoritarian and (at least self proclaimed) left.
Every time that people are accused of being “tankies”, they turn out to be correct.
Meanwhile, “authoritarian” is not a meaningful label, as all relevant polities are “authoritarian”, and the people who get called “tankies” are almost always to the left of those who invoke the word.
I must’ve forgot the NATO invasion of Crimea in 2014
Not sure what you are even trying to imply here, considering that Russia’s actions in Crimea (a part of Ukraine that tried to secede from Ukraine before, and the population of which overwhelmingly wanted to join Russia, according to studies conducted by NATO) came after and as a response to NATO’s aggression (including NATO doing a coup against the Ukrainian government - which you are completely fine with).
If you were trying to claim that the invaders of Iraq (at least twice), Afghanistan, Iran, Syria, Palestine, and many other places are not the most prolific invaders in the world, then you were just being extremely silly.
Wasn’t there this whole story of NATO stripping the voting rights of Crimean folks who wanted to join Russia just before the impromptu post-hoc referendum to justify that invasion?
Again, not sure what you are trying to imply, considering that the population of Crimea was very anti-NATO and did try to secede from Ukraine as early as 1990s, and NATO’s studies also concluded that the population of Crimea wanted to join Russia.
But you don’t think that Crimea deserves self-determination, do you?
I must’ve also forgot about the NATO invasion of Georgia in 2008, darn!
You mean when Georgia attacked South Ossetians and Russian peacekeepers in South Ossetia? Do tell how that situation should have been handled.
Great question! Now do the same for the Baltics or Sweden.
You didn’t answer the question.
Also, not sure what I should be doing for the nazi chihuahuas that are literally a part of the most prolific invader in the world (and literally organise parades in honour of SS troops).
You’ll be surprised how nervous smaller countries get when one of the strongest armies in the world regularly executes larger and larger maneuvers at their borders and in their airspace.
Well, they should probably stop invading everywhere, then, and pay reparations to the people of Iraq, Iran, Syria, Afghanistan, Palestine, and many other places.
Really bizarre to imply that they are some innocent victims of “one of the strongest armies in the world” when they are a part of the polity with the most expensive and vile military in the world.
Also bizarre to pretend as if they couldn’t, for example, ally with Russia if they needed protection from somebody. There was literally nothing preventing that (other than their greed and racism).
They might even think about joining a defensive military alliance.
It’s cute how you pretend that the invaders of Iraq and Afghanistan, the genocidaires of Palestine are a “defensive alliance”.
NATO leadership itself admits that it’s just there to do whatever the US tells them to do.
If Russia doesn’t want that, then it was not the brightest move to double down and invade Ukraine.
NATO leadership has nobody but itself to blame for pushing for war with Russia (by their own admission) and then being beaten.
Ukraine is also a significant wheat exporter and invading it in a war of aggression
You seem to be confused - Ukraine is the one on the side of NATO in these conflicts (including Syria).
Also, what do you think a state should do when the most prolific invader in the world gathers weapons and military personnel on its borders, especially after doing a coup against a neighbouring state?
You are claiming that, not me
Of course you don’t claim that you support these things - you would rather conceal that fact.
And of course other people who see that you do support those things are going to point that out.
Also, thinking that someone who disagrees with you on one thing also disagrees on all others is textbook tankie black and white thinking…
The word “tankie” just means “a person who is correct”. Time and time again, this fact keeps being proven.
Propaganda is just messaging with the goal of influencing people in favour of some causes and the like. Obviously, not all propaganda is bad, contrary to your claim. You also do frequent places that engage in propaganda (whether good or bad), and engage in propaganda yourself.
Also, curiously, you seem to only be vocal about propaganda when your actions favour the most prolific aggressor in the world.
You say this, but you support the actual credit scores, along with things like colonialism and genocide.
You are fine with propaganda, so why are you complaining about it in this case?
They very obviously are. Not sure why you are pretending otherwise.
You don’t even know what the social credit system is/was, and it is very obviously just yet another “enemies of my empire are bad” sort of thing. In this particular case, you went for the “Chinese people - bad” variation.