Almost a Toblerone on wheels.

That depends on actual ceiling height. Might be perfectly fine. Or you just drive around little people.

But how reliable? With which guarantees? What are the prerequisites for this to work at all? Telling people from each other apart is one thing, the other is telling them reliably apart from a machine generated text.

But it does not show a sufficient formal proof and no experimental validation. Many important questions to evaluate the concept are left unanswered, which limits the interpretability and condenses it to “just trust me, bro, it’s a good idea, because I say so”.

Yeah, still, I wouldn’t claim “as no human would end up falling into that”, given that it may not be that unlikely to find at least one human who displays similar writing the more humans you involve.

Until a formal analysis is presented and an experimental study is published, which covers the most important influencing factors, the reliability of this concept is limited.

In German I deliberately write the word “Standard” (same meaning as the English “standard”) with “t” at the end: “Standart”. Likewise all words that have it as a stem, such as “standartmäßig” or “Standartabweichung” (“according to standard”, “standard deviation”).

The reason:
Etymologically (although contested), “Standard” developed from the Old Low Franconian (Old Dutch) compound “standhard” just as in “stand + hard”, meaning “standing firm” or “steadfast” (like your morning wood :D ).
The other, contesting, etymology derives it from the Old French “estendre”: such as in “extend”.

However, while the particle “hard” became “hart” in modern German, officially, “Standard” still has to be written with the “d”. Thus, writing “Standart” with “t” is my silent rebellion against logical inconsistencies in languages.

In English I don’t care, because “hard” is still written with “d”, therefore “standard” is absolutely fine for me here.

Funnily, some dictionaries, e.g. DWDS, declare “Standart” a common orthographic mistake.

But I will keep writing “Standart”, until “Standart” becomes the new ‘Standart’. ;)

Edit:
I just remembered a second reason:
In German “Standard” is usually even pronounced with the harder “t”. Nobody says “Standard” with the soft “d” as it is usual in English. Same thing with “hart”. So even more reason to update the German ‘Standard’ to ‘Standart’.

Although this looks like a clever approach, a kind of stochastic key, I do not see how this guarantees to distinguish text written by big babble machines versus humans. Humans also have a certain pattern of writing, a given distribution of how some words are more likely to appear than others. How can one tell them really apart?

As an indicator, yeah, might be usable. But I wouldn’t read too much into it before seeing results of a study that runs actual tests.

with enough text, you will see that certain words are used more often

Which is also a thing humans do.

get off the computer

I know some of these words, yet fail to comprehend their meaning. Weird constellation. What does that even mean? /j