Have you considered that the down votes are because your comment adds nothing to the discussion except ragebait?
Even better when it also does “emergency avoidance” and sends you right into guardrails or oncoming traffic. That happens only once to you unwanted during the lifetime of the car and you immediately turn that shit off forever.
There should be a ceiling with patents, where if you make 10x back of what it cost your r&d (or whatever 5x of your yearly revenue), the patent should just be considered expired no matter how much time passed.
It should never be an infinite source of money.
I mean that you would have to test yourself. To me it seems like AI funnily enough has the same issues as humans, and that’s that it works worse in legacy codebases full of tech debt, and in large monoliths.
But it can still be an invaluable tool.
Indeed the more skilled you are the more infuriating it becomes when it does the dumbest shit.
It can write code decently well and fast, and is amazing at finding stuff in a large project.
But you still 100% need to verify what it does and truly understand it.
Efficient yes, but humanoid robots are much more likely to be accepted by the general public.