An app should be allowed to manage the legal exposure of permitting you to use it to do something illegal, if we’re going to permit apps to be sued because they didn’t stop someone from doing something illegal.
- 0 Posts
- 16 Comments
- crashfrog@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.world•How one woman’s Tesla was remotely controlled – and used to harass her – by an abusive ex-partnerEnglish13·5 days ago
- crashfrog@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.world•How one woman’s Tesla was remotely controlled – and used to harass her – by an abusive ex-partnerEnglish15·6 days ago
Why would it be legal for you to drive a car without a license
- crashfrog@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.world•How one woman’s Tesla was remotely controlled – and used to harass her – by an abusive ex-partnerEnglish14·6 days ago
Yes; he applied parental controls from his account to her account by misrepresenting to Tesla that she was a juvenile driving his car
- crashfrog@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.world•How one woman’s Tesla was remotely controlled – and used to harass her – by an abusive ex-partnerEnglish51·6 days ago
It literally was the parents
“Valet mode” also exists because valets were joyriding people’s Teslas
- crashfrog@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.world•How one woman’s Tesla was remotely controlled – and used to harass her – by an abusive ex-partnerEnglish35·6 days ago
I’m not saying you should be required to show it; just that if you can, and do, they should be barred from applying juvenile controls to the account held by you, an adult.
- crashfrog@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.world•How one woman’s Tesla was remotely controlled – and used to harass her – by an abusive ex-partnerEnglish16·6 days ago
Why wouldn’t your management account for a car need to know whether you’re a licensed driver?
- crashfrog@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.world•How one woman’s Tesla was remotely controlled – and used to harass her – by an abusive ex-partnerEnglish12·6 days ago
Remember, Tesla added this feature after widespread demand for parental controls on use following an incident in which a teenager killed themselves by driving too fast. People asked why they couldn’t override the car with parental controls if that feature was a technical possibility and there was even talk of using legal force to make them do it if they didn’t voluntarily comply.
Tesla requiring proof that the limited account belonged to a minor was not going to be permitted. Parents did this to us.
- crashfrog@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.world•How one woman’s Tesla was remotely controlled – and used to harass her – by an abusive ex-partnerEnglish117·6 days ago
We need a “right to be treated as an adult” affirmed by Congress that prohibits use of parental controls against users who can demonstrate adulthood by presentation of ID
- crashfrog@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.world•Devastated father says his 9-year-old son spent $118,000 on YouTube ad campaigns for his Minecraft channel using a company credit card — bill racked up in just three weeks was supposed to be one $20English152·7 days ago
Google is insane about billing any random ass card you’ve ever used in any system adjacent to them. I had them bill a domain name fee to my fucking government travel card just because I’d set it up once to pay for a hotel or something. Completely not the card I’d put in to pay for the domain name - they just changed it on their own.
- crashfrog@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.world•Bernie Sanders proposes 20 year prison sentence for AI devs who plow ahead with Artificial Superintelligence plans - penalty on par with illegally developing rogue nuclear weaponsEnglish13·10 days ago
It’s not illegal to develop nuclear weapons. It’s illegal to endanger people with nuclear materials, though
Right up there with “why wont Twitter do something about these obscure Nazi accounts I retweet to my audience of 2 million”
Oh no, I don’t like the tokens generated by the hand-cranked token generator I won’t stop cranking
- crashfrog@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.world•AI Didn't Steal the Mathematician's Work, Sam Altman DidEnglish22·13 days ago
They’re mostly made up and you should pay attention to who nobody expects to follow the laws of war (Russia, any Muslims at all)
- crashfrog@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.world•AI Didn't Steal the Mathematician's Work, Sam Altman DidEnglish3·13 days ago
How would you enforce a law against war, and who would it apply to?
- crashfrog@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.world•AI Didn't Steal the Mathematician's Work, Sam Altman DidEnglish4·13 days ago
It was a male grad student (Raymond Gosling) who did the work for Rosalind Franklin; Franklin reported to Maurice Wilkins; Franklin, Wilkins, Watson, and Crick collaborated for a two-paper submission to Nature which publicized the X-ray evidence for, and the theoretical implications of, DNA’s double-helical structure. The surviving members of this collaboration won the Nobel Prize (it is not generally awarded posthumously.)
This has morphed into a claim that “Watson and Crick stole Franklin’s work” because they’re white men and she’s a woman.
Then pass a law that prevents them from doing so. You can’t have it both ways - you can’t hold them legally liable for illegal uses of their platform or technology and bar them from trying to stop illegal uses of their technology.