+1 for not using the energy from the inconvenient truth for literal doomerism
- 0 Posts
- 5 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
Cake day: February 2nd, 2024
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
- jh29a@lemmy.blahaj.zonetoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•Might put you out to stud if you're a fast runner for a while, though8·13 days ago
no. that’s a cohorse girl.
I don’t know why some kinds of flavour taste bad in my opinion. I wouldn’t want to eat something that I’ve already tasted to taste bad, but I’m generally open to things I don’t know (unless they sound disgusting, which is mostly reserved to mold (cheese) and bugs that weren’t prepared abstractly enough, as opposed to shrimp for example.
- jh29a@lemmy.blahaj.zonetoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.world•What's your entirely unimportant and inconsequential hot take?0·15 days ago
Do you mean the literal belief-level acceptance of factual statements or emotional assessments (of the world without the viewer) that are wrong or worse than the world is, or something about how much agency the viewer has or where they should use it?
Lowe’s