Did someone ruin your day or something? What is your problem with web pages from another country? Why do you care?
Have you considered that Japanese consumers like it that way?
I don’t really understand what you’re trying to say, here. Why does Japanese preference for web marketing bother you that much?
It’s almost like they have another culture than North American or European…
To reiterate the point, we also share that cognitive commonality with most birds and mammals too, so it doesn’t really mean much.
Radicale was easy enough for me. Davx5 on android to connect to it, and that’s it.
Can’t argue with that.
That expression is a fair bit older than Megadeth.
There is.
when it clearly should not be doing it.
No, sorry. We don’t know enough to say this. What were the options when configuring ext4? What record size is grafana using? Mariadb or postgres? Is there contention with another db? Is there a mounted NFS path in the same ext4 partition with weird block settings? There are lots of legitimate config reasons for op’s problem, but there are so many parts of op’s setup we don’t know, we similarly can’t possibly know what the issue is.
Swappiness works as intended in most default scheduler configurations and seeing high swap is a symptom, not an issue. It is almost always more productive to find out why the swapping is happening.
Not sure what you’re getting at with TRIM.
I agree that hitting swap is not ideal, but messing with swappiness sysctl is almost never the answer and very often leads to more problems than it solves.
If you want to tune for workload without needing fairly deep understanding of how Linux manages memory, use a sysctl that sets a whole system behaviour like CPU governor presets.
IMO, Linux is configured for “old” systems by default: slow HDDs, and constrained RAM pools, where disk IO really, really needs caching, and where idle background processes take a large fraction of RAM.
Not really a matter of opinion, and not true since kernel 5.1 when ssds became first class citizens.
I’m not really sure what you’re getting at. The blockchain is a good mechanism to maintain a source of truth that is inspectable and verifiable by anyone. It would only serve to certify that official counts can’t be tampered with in certain ways.
But it doesn’t replace the whole democratic voting process. It doesn’t protect against coercive voting, for instance.
My point originally was that blockchain can be of use to us, but tech bros ruined its rep. Same with AI. I’ve been waiting for routers with ai-powered (really, just machine learning) firewalls that can adapt rules to environments. But instead of that, everyone is obsessed with generative stuff that isnt very good.
Yes, exactly.
Block chain would have been an amazing solution to most democratic vote validation processes.
The internet isn’t just for robots, you know. We still have to read with our own eyes.
Communication is a two-way street. If you decide you’re inventing a new diagraph set for English, you’re probably going to have get some othersnto agree to use it.