But since anon already stated them being non-gay, shouldn’t we judge the activities in a non-gay context?

It’s really challenging when the post starts out with a declaration of not being gay, proceeds to describe activities which might potentially be gay, and then ends with a redeclaration of anon being not gay.

maybe it is fake, but is anon gay or no???

Happened to me last night.

Seems like I just got hit with it too today or yesterday, and it was being rolled out since about a month ago. Sad.

Here’s a hackernews post on it (3 days old):
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49326106