The problem with relying on bots for that is that if they post too much content they end overwhelming the members and bringing “organic” output down. Any bot would have to be set up so that it never gets to post more than any “real” member.
- 2 Posts
- 4 Comments
- rglullis@communick.newstoFediverse@lemmy.world•Growing content diversity and entertainment on the fediverse - we can do it together!English6·5 days ago
- rglullis@communick.newstoFediverse@lemmy.world•Growing content diversity and entertainment on the fediverse - we can do it together!English6·5 days ago
Don’t think of these efforts as some form of central planning, but as a simple catalyst.
- rglullis@communick.newstoFediverse@lemmy.world•Growing content diversity and entertainment on the fediverse - we can do it together!English1·5 days ago
I’ve tried that with the “Community Ambassadors” idea where people could get content from different sources to help bring content to the curated communities on fediverser. It went largely ignored.
I’m more than willing to try again, however I am tired of instance drama and the tribal mentality that makes people associate a community to “their” instance. So I am not interested in supporting this in any instance that does not have a specific topic or interest group behind.
That’s essentially what I was doing with the “Community Ambassador” feature on fediverser. They could define all types of RSS feeds as sources of content, and there is a button that lets them select and easily create posts on the Lemmy communities.