If it was about real AI – not stochastic parrots – I would be all for it. What happened to those developments that started in the 70s where you have automatic formal proofs that a piece of code does what it is supposed to do? That is intelligent. Producing slop more voluminous and convoluted than humans could produce or understand is not intelligent software architecture just like fixing a hole in a roof by throwing what sticks at it is not intelligent building architecture. Both may do the job for some time. But what are the long-term costs and who is capable to clean up? In my opinion, what’s most desired is tools that are bug free, do what they should without annoying the user, and are radically simplified in their architecture. (For example, I would be happy with a perfectly working product that does what NFS or Samba aspire and fail to do for decades.) Apparently, AI can’t deliver that. To have the billionth app that is a browser wrapper and shows me exactly one website is much more important.
- 0 Posts
- 3 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: February 9th, 2025
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
- uszo165@futurology.todaytoTechnology@lemmy.world•GrapheneOS defends use of AI for codingEnglish187·11 days ago
- uszo165@futurology.todaytoTechnology@lemmy.world•Don’t Let Anyone Take Away Your Big Box of Cables - Jim Nielsen’s BlogEnglish4·11 days ago
I started to sell cables I don’t need anymore, this year. Works great and keeps the copper in the ground.
I sell individual cables. Some are new (some in original packaging), some are used.