openmic.social is an uncensored community. You may encounter strong language, controversial opinions, and mature or NSFW material. You must be 18+ to browse. Illegal content is prohibited and removed on sight — please report it. By continuing, you accept that you may see content you personally disagree with.
LLMs have made that kind of thing moot for LLM users. Honest ones, not so much.
You learn to spot LLM cover letters pretty quickly. And anybody who slips by won’t survive an interview.
I’d love to see someone try and perform in an interview with ChatGPT or Claude without me noticing from the other side of the table.
With no real way to verify, you’re just guessing. Educated guessing sure, but unverifiable guesses.
If I’m physically in the room with them im the interview, I’m pretty sure I’d notice if they’re using an AI for their responses.
Yes it would be difficult for them to access an LLM in your presence, but that would not be sufficient evidence to verify they did use AI previously. That’s just the assumption you’re making about them beforehand which colors your view of them.
I’m going to go ahead and stand by my original assessment. This nonsense belongs on a linkedinlunatics post. Adios.
The interview is the final test if an AI cover letter slips by us. Anyone trying that nonsense will quickly be exposed at the interview when they clearly don’t know what the hell they’re doing.
The paid models are quite good at writing English in a realistic way. They do have a shitton of training data and the models ate HUGE.
They still suck at doing lots of things, like writing code and listening to me. Same as frer LLMs