I’m not stuck in time. I’ve embraced dependability.

  • LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    “I’m in this picture and it’s quite OK here.”

    My car is a 20 year old shitbox, my bike gets new brake pads and a bit of random lubricant on the chain once a year and other “maintenance” only when parts fall off, and my stereo is a mix of hand me downs from my dad’s college days and some eBay home theatre stuff that got sold because it didn’t support the newest HDMI bullshit.

    Oh, and of course it is a Thinkpad, thanks for asking.

    Just the other day, a friend of mine running Arch tried to install something, which resulted in him having to do a full system update, including fixing several “that should not happen” s. Meanwhile, every few years I spend an evening update to the newest stable, and never had bigger issues than the color of some icon being unfamiliar.

    • 0x0@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      What?!
      You haven’t bowed to the gods of built-in obsolescence?! How dare you!?

    • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Man I always hear about these people who have to fix random that should not happen things. Yet I haven’t had that problem in a decade of using rolling distros.

      While ever time I’ve ever had a fixed release cycle distro update it implodes. What black magic fuckery is this.

      • LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I guess it depends on how much you can abuse or ignore it. Debian works just fine if you put it in a locker for 3 years and then try to update. With gentoo, if you didn’t update for a week, you might as well reinstall :)

        Arch is somehow in the middle, I had an arch VM that never had any problems except that certificate issue despite not getting many updates.

    • ReginaPhalange@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I feel like when humble-bragging Thinkpad it must be one of the models that became a Linux enthusiast meme.

      • LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        Nah, L390 Yoga. I wanted touch because i thought I’d use it, but it ended up in a docking station most of the time anyway. Upgraded RAM and SSD, battery still hold “a few hours” despite being 7+ years old. I figured those 8th gen quad cores would last a while, and so far, they do. Doesn’t feel too terrible compared to my modern core u 235 work laptop.

        • 𝕾𝖕𝖎𝖈𝖞 𝕿𝖚𝖓𝖆@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          I don’t have a Thinkpad myself. I do have a 10 year old Acer Aspire V3-372T. It’s a perfectly cromulent laptop. I use it to listen to podcasts and YouTube. I check my emails sometimes. I check weather.gov. I have a copy of my music library. I write my personal budgets. It has a touchscreen that I never use. I get around just fine.

          One day, I’ll either get a Thinkpad or a Framework.

          • LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            Perfectly fine if it does what it should. That is imo the essence of this post: Better is the enemy of good. I wouldn’t buy a new one (again), this one was a bit of an exception (customer return, with a little scratch), since used touch laptops with good performance were quite rare.