I just overheard a coworker saying “Oh, I would never try that in my life!”, in a discussion of food. (This was about consuming a steak cooked less than medium well). It made me wonder what life is like for those who refuse to try new food, especially those who refuse to try mundane things like fried shrimp.

Why limit yourself? It seems like such a closed-minded way to view food. Help me understand?

EDIT:

I wasn’t going to do this, but I’m tired of replying to people and will post this at the top.

The person that prompted this question is a close-minded piece of crap. He has no sensory issues, just a shitty mindset, with ignorance and prejudice on display with no shame. I have the pleasure of hearing his annoying shit every night.

The knee-jerk reactions I have received from people in this post have had me examine my own knee-jerk reactions, attributing malice to that which may be misunderstanding rather than bigotry or hatred. This is what I am taking away from this post. That even I should take a chill pill every now and again; it’s not all a tragedy.

I will not delete it, because there are some very thoughtful replies that explain different viewpoints, that people took time to type out. It would be disrespectful to them to do that.

Call me what you like. Don’t care. I will not be replying to any other replies.

  • Jeffool @lemmy.world
    1·
    19 hours ago

    It’s sheer curiosity when I ask if this is a hard and fast rule or is there wiggle room?

    Does this mean you’re not a fan of cold pizza? Or second day spaghetti/lasagna? I feel like they famously get better for a day or two of reheating.

    • Gonzako@lemmy.world
      1·
      15 hours ago

      There’s wiggle room ipso facto that me knowing its reheated makes me simply not want it while I wouldn’t really have much of a worry eating it. Cold pizza has like an 16h from cooked period for me. Lasagna maybe? But spaghetti are hard no.