• Carnelian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    only while the kids exist as you forced them into existence

    Many parents have the same realization about their adopted children. You could argue that both types of parents are delusional but the causality isn’t relevant

    imagine you could see your entire life

    The capacity for imagining your whole life presupposes that you have already begun living, silly :3 but okay. Why would this primordial spirit be interested in life at all if it’s optional? Is living your life inherently worth considering, or something?

    • baines@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      choosing to take on the responsibility is the same imo

      biological kid or not once you bring it home it’s then the same, feeling this for random strangers would be odd

      acknowledging that a optional life would be skipped kinda is my point

      • Carnelian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Okay, so it is possible to find inherent meaning in lives you did not create. Yay!

        For part 2, you’re ignoring my question.

        Why would your thought experiment ghost even be considering life? Even before the point of knowing whether it would be “good or bad”. Why does it bother checking that at all?

        Put another way: when some dumb loser asks if I want to invest in an NFT, I don’t even need to consider that. I know inherently that what I’m being offered is fundamentally without value to anyone.

        The fact that you are evaluating your life at all in your thought experiment implies that the thing you are being offered has the potential to be valuable, yes?

        • baines@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Okay, so it is possible to find inherent meaning in lives you did not create. Yay!

          except predication of choice makes it literally not inherent

          neither does potential imply inherent either

          it’s trivial to imagine simple real world examples that would make any positive aspect of living rather insufficient to the point where dying young and unexpectedly is almost a blessing among alternatives

          if aggressive cancer, long lasting stroke or alzheimer’s is in my future let me die sooner in my sleep

          to say nothing of famine, massive drought and war

          if i knew i’d live to experience alzheimer’s let me never be born

          • Carnelian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            except predication of choice makes it literally not inherent

            Things aren’t any less meaningful just because you chose them. For example I’ve been playing the same guitar for over 20 years. That instrument is now inherently meaningful to me in a way that others are not. It’s inherently irreplaceable to me. You’ll find most musicians bond with their instrument in a similar way

            neither does potential imply inherent either

            Of course it does. Every time a guitar is destroyed on stage thousands of discussions break out about how upsetting and wasteful it is. How it could have been so meaningful to a child who wants to play but doesn’t have the means.

            We see these things and we want to connect them with the people who their meaning will most benefit, precisely because they are inherently meaningful.

            big list of horrible things

            The question of whether or not you will experience extreme suffering is not relevant to the meaning your life possesses. The 5,000 people who were just swept away in Nepal have not had their lives rendered meaningless, regardless of whether or not they would have chosen not to be born if they knew that would be their fate