Seriously, who needs to record someone without the knowledge of the person being recorded? That’s a big red flag, a perverted character, there’s no other explanation. Creepy Mark Zuckerberg allowed other creepy characters to share personal moments with him.

  • PhAzE@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I didn’t pay premium, my health plan covers vision and they were dirt cheap. I picked up gen 1 glasses before there were audio only fashion glasses.

    Go ahead and tell me what else I did since you seem to think you know me so well.

    • 3abas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I don’t think I know you at all, I’m responding strictly to what you said…

      Gen 1 was released in 2023 at $299. Before then, you could buy a Razer Anzu for $200, a Fauna for $299 if you wanted better “luxury” than the RayBan logo on the shitty meta glasses, or a JLab JBuds Frames for $50 if all you cared about are the things you said you cared about.

      It’s okay to have been uninformed, it’s okay that you didn’t know there were other options. It’s not okay to gaslight everyone by pretending the meta glasses invented a solution for the use cases you listed…

      I have Nothing headphones personally which I use with transparency mode, and it works perfectly fine for everything you said you needed your camera equipped glasses for… You wanted smart glasses, that’s alright to say, but it certainly isn’t only solution to your needs.