• ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      138
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      12 days ago

      Bullshit. Don’t lie to me. You think “fire” can just “burn” a building and it will collapse because “gravity”? I bet you believe in other fairy tales too, like public healthcare and the moon

        • gex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          12 days ago

          Do You believe in cheese? “Cheese” is an edible polymer developed by DuPont in the 50s. Do you believe that the government holds tons of cheese in caves in Missouri? Those are obviously the location of the soundstages used to film the lunar landings.

      • danc4498@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        If the moon was real then how come nobody talked about it before stanley Kubrick made 2001 a space odyssey?

      • glups@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        12 days ago

        There was a kid in my class for aviation maintenance who was a genuine flat earther. If you ever pressed him on it he would say “what do you know, you probably think we landed on the moon!”

        • kestrel7_7@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          So sad for him that he never went to the beach. Never watched a ship slip over the horizon. Just depressing.

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      It was also smacked by debris from the falling tower that ended up damaging several support trusses and simultaneously igniting like a dozen floors on fire at the same time. Tbh it’s kinda amazing the building lasted as long as it did.

      • W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        12 days ago

        The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.

      • SirLeToet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        Was it the WTC7 sized chunk of the north tower that fell on top of it?

        Crazy how they conspiracied that.

      • Shindo66@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        12 days ago

        Theres been so many studies by incredibly reputable people. They aren’t going to believe no matter how much is said. At this point they’re worse than the maga people. Their believing in the lie has cost millions of deaths in the middle east through global imperialism. They dont want that blood on their hands and its finally gone into a war with Iran that will never end. The people who you are asking to tell you the truth wouldnt even tell you that the building was so full of hazardous building materials that it was going to give untold amounts of people cancer.