• Opisek@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    I thought declaude would be like degoogle.

    Nope, turns out what they do is precisely the opposite. They try to remove those described markers. Real scummy.

      • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I think the thing that frustrates me most about AI is that so many people seem to have forgotten that writers exist and wrote huge amounts of text - books, news articles, magazines - for centuries. But now, anytime someone writes a few cogent paragraphs, you get people screaming “AI!!! IT’S AI!!!”.

        I know, because it has happened to me.

        The article, to me, sounds like a competent author wrote it. Which is representative of a lot of the text LLMs were trained on.

        • black0ut@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          I can’t tell you about the text, but the whole site is vibe coded. The CSS, the js, everything. Which doesn’t really inspire much confidence on the text, especially as it’s explaining how to bypass the claude detector.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’m against trying to “censor” LLMs, but yeah. What’s even the ostensible benevolent scenario for stripping invisible watermarking from Claude?

      I can’t think of one, playing devil’s advocate.

      It’s pretty scummy, indeed.

      • AlmightyDoorman@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I am against AI and LLMs but the reason is quite simple, a lot of modern writing is offical bullshit to get stuff approved. Research grants, medical therapy approval, offical work mail that has to sound professional, job applications (insofar that noone cares what you write, they want a standard template and pick a candidate along qualifications anyways.). All these texts cost a lot of time and it makes no difference if a human or some copy machine writes it. And tbh. were it not for all the disadvantages of modern LLMs i would use it for the exact same reason, because sitting at a grant application for two hours while others do it in 5min is fucking useless and exhausting.

        • CovertOperative@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          If it’s stuff that no one cares what you write, then they also won’t care if it’s proveably written by AI or not. So removing the watermark still does nothing beneficial.