• eicker@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Turns out telling an entire generation that AI will replace half their jobs, flood the internet with slop and make billionaires richer didn’t produce boundless techno optimism. Who could have predicted that? The AI industry may have a capability problem, but it definitely has a messaging problem.

    • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      51 minutes ago

      to be honest in the age of targeted advertisement opinion manipulation I would not be surprised if more young people would be happy addicts to it

    • Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      The AI industry is actively telling companies that they can become ‘more efficient’ (i.e. fire workers) with AI; that’s more than a mere ‘messaging problem’.

      It has a financial interest in companies firing their workers and raising prices to make room for it.

      • Darkonion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        How it feels to me is that the goal is for the world to become so intrusive/demanding/stressful that the only way to exist in it sanely would be to build an interactive buffer between the person and the greater world, and they want to sell these brown nosing AI agents as that buffer.

        I detest the ethics, economic, and environmental costs of these platforms, but the part of me that is casting around wildly for some sort of life preserver wonders if somehow these horrible contraptions of inevitable doom might just provide some short term relief.