• lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Pervert Glasses™️ by definition can not be HIPAA compliant.

    The fact that this doctor even made the attempt should warrant a serious review of their conduct.

    • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      30 days ago

      I used to work at a hospital and I have experience with doctors who firmly believe that their comfort and convenience tops HIPAA and anything else. I had to file several violations for doctors who wouldn’t stop using SMS instead of their pagers. Every time their excuse was “I don’t like the pager, it’s old.”There is a nonzero chance that this doctor didn’t even continue thinking about the consequences beyond “but I need to have the latest thing”.

    • trebach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It seems according to the video the surgeon had already seen the patient in a state of undress so this is even bigger than HIPAA. If they were recording, he’s probably doing time for each patient visit.

      • tempest@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Even if they were not recording from his perspective you have no idea what the stupid things are doing. You don’t really control them, Meta does.

      • EpeeGnome@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        30 days ago

        So his solution to getting sued is that he creates another reason to be sued? Wearing a potentially always on, personally controlled recording device, that has been reported to send the footage to overseas workers to categorize it without user knowledge, in a HIPAA setting is just asking for another lawsuit.