So much for the constitution

  • Hawanja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Good, means less lunatics waving around guns. No objection here.
    To the people bitching, it’s a moot point when you can buy a gun at virtually every wallmart in the country.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      This is stupid easy to bypass plus you still need metal parts to make it work

      Guns are actually really easy to make and can be assembled from parts found at a local hardware store. If you want something fancier you could even mill a gun out of metal

      • Hawanja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Yeah but a right wing incel maniac trying to get a gun to go blow away a high school isn’t going to know how to mill his own gun. He might download one and use his father’s 3D printer to make one.

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zipOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          11 hours ago

          You can’t use a 3D printer to make a working gun and it isn’t possible to distinguish a gun from anything else.

          This is security theater that hurts the general public and small businesses while giving yet more power to the wealthy

          • Hawanja@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            How does it hurt the general public, exactly? By not letting them shoot each other?

            • Possibly linux@lemmy.zipOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Because mass surveillance is bad? I don’t want my printer to send everything I print to private companies

              Even if you are somehow ok with the surveillance, there are still issues with copywrite. I’m pretty sure it would be pretty easy for some large company to seal ideas or to prevent you from making replacement parts for stuff that you bought and paid for

              • Hawanja@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Because mass surveillance is bad? I don’t want my printer to send everything I print to private companies

                I am ok with someone not being able to print out a gun and then blow people away with it.
                And if mass surveillance bothers you, then you should get rid of your cell phone.
                Also, private companies already have every bit of information about you. How do you think Google and Facebook and Twitter make their money?

                Even if you are somehow ok with the surveillance, there are still issues with copywrite. I’m pretty sure it would be pretty easy for some large company to seal ideas or to prevent you from making replacement parts for stuff that you bought and paid for

                Yeah but not everything I leagally buy and pay for can be used to murder people. For example, if I print out a battery cover for my remote control I then cannot go to a hotel room in Las Vegas and massacre 50 people at a country music festival with it.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Won’t they just use his father’s gun? That’s what they always seem to do.

      • Hawanja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Probably zero.
        I just like the idea of there being less guns on the street.
        I also like the idea of access to guns being highly regulated.

        • village604@adultswim.fan
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I don’t disagree with you.

          But this type of law is the exact same as the age verification laws.

          There’s a plausible sounding risk, but if you dig deeper it’s always the government reducing freedoms in a way that doesn’t really help the stated goals.

          325 3d printed guns were seized in 2024. That’s a drop in the ocean.

            • village604@adultswim.fan
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              They sell it as wanting to protect children, but what they really want is to be able to track everything you do on your device, because the verification will happen at the OS level.

              It’s something that sounds sensible at first. Of course it would be great to be able to prevent children from going certain places online and interacting with predators.

              But what’s actually happening is everyone is sacrificing their right to privacy for pretty much nothing, because anyone determined enough can get around any safety measure. And both kids and criminals excel at creativity getting around blocks.

              Not to mention that a lot of the verification happens through private companies, who shouldn’t be trusted with it.