And ban alcohol, too. And sugar.
- 0 Posts
- 12 Comments
- BJW@lemmus.orgtoShowerthoughts@lemmy.world•As a dad I can finally watch breastfeeding without it being creepy. It's such a beautiful thing, and it warms my heart. It makes me feel more humanEnglish11·3 days ago
Dad or not, I’ve found it’s all about your facial expression in determining whether the feeder finds someone watching to be creepy or not. That’s why whenever I see a woman breastfeeding, I abruptly stop whatever I’m doing, open my eyes as wide as possible, stare directly, unblinking, and start slowly nodding encouragingly, so they know that I approve, while a big, toothy grin blossoms on my face to make it further known that I find the sight beautiful. Then I add a thumbs up at the end, once my grin is as wide as possible, just to make it all official.
Surprisingly I think it may actually accelerate the feeding process, because the mothers always stop breastfeeding soon after I finish non-verbally communicating that I find what they’re doing to be beautiful, in a non-creepy way. Humans are amazing! 😍
- BJW@lemmus.orgtoTechnology@lemmy.world•AI-generated books are flooding Amazon and tanking sales for human authorsEnglish1·3 days ago
People with metal teeth! They can bite through this, they can bite through that…
They can even bite through the main power conduit!
- BJW@lemmus.orgtoTechnology@lemmy.world•Meta Ran Ads for an App That Promised to Nudify Female PoliticiansEnglish7·4 days ago
You did? I sincerely doubt Meta can compel AOC’s consent.
If they could, I’d be in that audience, too.
She’s not Republican, though, so her morals aren’t available for the highest bidder. The target audience you’re looking for is almost certainly Republican: they are used to their politicians being for sale, and even if they can’t acquire consent they’re of the “fuck your feelings” philosophy so it doesn’t actually matter if you have their consent.
This enables far more particles to enter without touching. Or disgruntled raccoons.
Because it totally matters how you were fooled…
Except when you can’t discern the difference between hand crafted and AI-generated, but they insist on calling it slop. Then it loses all meaning, and becomes clear it’s just antagonistic slang used by the prejudiced. Same with vibe, when they use it to mean any use of AI in coding.
In other words, there is slop and there are vibe coded projects, but the most offensive use those terms universally simply to be derogative and incendiary.
Yes, I am. I have a global pre-processor directive for all of my prompts, so it always includes “match existing code style, formatting and conventions.” The result is indistinguishable from hand written code. Thinking you can magically discern what was written by AI is delusional.
Yeah, just like more experienced artists can see the AI generated pixels.
This is just to let their prejudice flag fly. There’s no way to actually tell AI was used if the planning and assisting meta-data files aren’t committed to the repo. Nothing has truly changed. They might as well ban anyone who thinks about the color pink more then twice per day - it would be just as easy to enforce.
Same here. I think Lemmy is the den of vipers when it comes to hate and prejudice of AI.
We should also ban sugar, for all the same reasons.