Codeberg seems to ban vibecoded Projects; reason might be german copyright law

>It looks like Codeberg want only copyrighted material in their service, so it is reliable in the future that e.g. licenses must be followed (e.g. GPL), and copyright doesn’t suddenly get declared as being of the model owner, and it isn’t a copy of something else.
That is a cautious reasonable position - in early days of LLM coding (3 years ago!) indemnity from model companies was a major issue globally because of the lack of clarity of the law around this. The US specifically has settled on it being (effectively?) public domain. But I don’t think that is fully settled, and it certainly isn’t settled in international copyright law.
The goal of the vague “mostly” in the Codeberg change is to ensure there is enough human input to the code they host, to be reasonably sure under German copyright law it is copyright of the person sharing it.

edit: link to poll that caused it (might be down due to high traffic) https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/org/pulls/1253#issuecomment-19820434

edit 1: i dont defend/oppose this move, i just find it interesting

  • BJW@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    This is just to let their prejudice flag fly. There’s no way to actually tell AI was used if the planning and assisting meta-data files aren’t committed to the repo. Nothing has truly changed. They might as well ban anyone who thinks about the color pink more then twice per day - it would be just as easy to enforce.

    • poVoq@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      You might not be able to tell, but the signs something is LLM generated are pretty obvious to more experienced programmers.

      • tofu@lemmy.nocturnal.garden
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        That, plus, it’s driving away vibe coders just because they don’t want to be there. The rule doesn’t have to be enforceable 100% in order to be effective.

      • BJW@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah, just like more experienced artists can see the AI generated pixels.

          • BJW@lemmus.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Yes, I am. I have a global pre-processor directive for all of my prompts, so it always includes “match existing code style, formatting and conventions.” The result is indistinguishable from hand written code. Thinking you can magically discern what was written by AI is delusional.

            • poVoq@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Sorry but you are clearly delusional. There is no magic involved, just being able to look at the structure of the code and the pattern of the commits. It’s fairly easy in fact.