No. Not enough, not close, deep, or consistent enough.

Is this with accepting all their terms and functionality, or also when declining?

Does it help you in acceptance or in not doing it?

Two minute rule. If you can do it in two minutes, just do it.

Do you consider Lemmy not to be social media? I guess that’s the for the most part, rather than time used?

Their aspiration is to rule over all of America.

On what basis did you proclaim “No! Not legal!” if you’re now surprised by the license? Misunderstanding of the license?

What’s the fine print?

Maybe they made their own comment in here, lol

Post on Lemmy, obviously.

For debate, I’d be willing to take a different position.

I don’t think it having some upside makes it a good/okay thing… Still seems pretty stupid and net negative.

Could always be a cash grab. Announce stupid thing, get paid to stop stupid thing.

I think the license conditions are pretty clear. The main issue is that LLMs can not respect the license conditions.

The content I published under AGPL I want to be used freely under copyleft. Reproduction without AGPL does not meet those conditions. Stuff I published under CC-BY-SA, LLMs can’t guarantee either BY attribution nor consistently reproduce SA.

Whether training and consequential abstraction without reproduction is acceptable is a more difficult, subjective, and nuanced question.

I don’t necessarily escape it.

Usually, I keep busy. The feeling of nothing is enjoyable I know too. I switch to something else or wait for it to pass.

I watch every Jake Broe video on 1.3. He talks slow.

Really, it depends. Theres plenty I speed up and plenty I watch at 1x.

It depends on content, topic, style, directing. Speedup is fine for most information consumption. When its a documentary, the directing and length often makes 1x more viable.

This makes me wonder how the deno targeting Oracle to free the JavaScript trademark process is coming along. It’s been a while since I read something from it.

Every tweet

Poop emoji - this has been fact checked but can not be independently verified due to lack of context

The title is in Early Access, and apparently they already removed the AI cutscenes.

On the Steam store page, the second trailer still shows an AI trailer. I assume it was in this style.

Currently, it sits at 70 Steam reviews; Mixed.

Half of the 70 is certainly not a huge backlash. Given they removed it now, and it’s still in early access, maybe they can recover.

CC BY-SA gives freedom of use. Why do you think additional consent would be necessary? Or do you mean that because the restricting conditions are not met, additional consent would be necessary?

Given the form of transformation, Share-Alike is certainly difficult to meet, if not impossible. Is that what you referred to with “is not open”? Or do you mean something else?