I’m not sure we’ve read the same article. There are literally interactive demonstrations within the page to demonstrate how the concept works.
Angry Fuck
- 0 Posts
- 5 Comments
Joined 5 months ago
Cake day: April 4th, 2026
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
- Angry Fuck@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.world•How AI text watermarking works: a visual guideEnglish2·20 hours ago
- Angry Fuck@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.world•First test flight of largest all-electric aircraft used just $5 of electricityEnglish6·2 days ago
I fucking hate everyone and would love to subject you fucks to 4g of pain taking off with a stupid catapult system. Nice math.
- Angry Fuck@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.world•How AI text watermarking works: a visual guideEnglish3·2 days ago
I thought the article explained that pretty reasonably on a scale of probability and weight. The longer the text, the more reliable the scoring.
- Angry Fuck@lemmy.worldtoMildly Infuriating@lemmy.world•Mike Solana, a multimillionaire investor, on college-educated Americans frustrated by narrowing economic opportunities or as he calls them, “broke losers with bachelors”English1·2 days ago
My Chinese LLM DeepSeek said we should bring back gibbeting…
Gish Gallop… if you’re going to start questioning whether the technique clearly demonstrated has validity, then you need to specifically state what your objections are, as opposed to vague statements. For emphasis, the demonstration isn’t on AI detecting, but rather AI watermarking. You wouldn’t use this tool to check if text was written by AI, but rather if the text was written by one singular LLM vs literally everything else.