• TIEPilot@lemmy.worldBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    I think we should keep the coal plant in warm storage just in case. One big hail storm/tornado could cripple this system. Just food for thought in an emergency.

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      In fairness, I don’t think that a coal power plant would fare any better against a tornado.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It is neither cheap nor easy to keep a coal plant in working order with a supply of fuel, “just in case”. Especially one that was set to retire anyway so probably has a lot of deferred maintenance and end of life components. Very much not worth it

      Redundancies for plant outages are already a feature of the grid

      • TIEPilot@lemmy.worldBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I would have suggested that as its the best bang for the buck. But people lose their mind when its on the table…

    • cb900f_bodhi@fedinsfw.app
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m not sure why you’re getting down votes for this. Isn’t having some redundancy or backup plan a good idea? What am I missing here?

      • ChubbyHot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Likely because the coal plant was set to retire anyway. No point in paying someone millions to keep this coal plant as a backup for rare events.

        The Power company will have contingencies and the national grid to rely on, which are cheaper than keeping an old coal plant warm.