• Naich@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    19 days ago

    “The law is clear, says Prof Jeannie Paterson. “If I deploy an AI agent and it causes harm to someone else, I am responsible for that harm.”

    In case you were wondering if it wasn’t the bleeding obvious.

        • Goodeye8@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          Even then nothing would happen because modern day capitalists are like kings and kings don’t get held accountable.

          • fartographer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 days ago

            Only princes do, and only when they’re super old and have ruined countless lives. After that, they’re sentenced to being treated as royalty while being addressed like a normal: a fate worse than death!

    • Giggles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      A human did this a human should be held responsible. “If you throw a ball in the air are you not responsible for where it lands”

      • shartgargle@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        Let’s say that ball is a hand grenade. Who gave it to you? It can’t be JUST the user if it’s that dangerous. Finally parents are being held to account if a kid uses a firearm inappropriately. The same should apply to companies who build AI, if it’s used to hack someone or make CSAM.

        • BlaestEgnen@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          The same should apply to companies who build AI, if it’s used to hack someone or make CSAM.

          Only if they host the model, if it’s a self hosted open source model, the entity hosting the model should be held accountable

          Also to keep your analogy going, if I tell you how to make a grenade. You then go out to buy supplies, make the grenade and blow up your neighbour, should I be held accountable for sharing knowledgea? Because I’m yet to hear about anyone getting into trouble for distributing the anarchist’s cookbook

          • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 days ago

            t>he entity hosting the model should be held accountable

            Not necessarily. If I buy a machine from a vendor, fail to test it to confirm that it’s safe to use in the way I intend to use it, and one of my employees gets maimed or killed by it, I’m liable, even though some liability might also be assignable to the manufacturer.

        • Womble@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          19 days ago

          The difference is that a hand grenade is illegal to own. A series of matrix multiplications is not.

          A better comparison is a knife. If you throw that in the air and it lands on someone you are responsible, the person who sold you a potentially dangerous but legal tool is not.

          Edit illegal, not legal. silly mistake