Firefox says it will keep supporting uBlock Origin even as Microsoft Edge and other Chromium browsers phase it out under Manifest V3.

  • bullsworth@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Sometimes I think it was a mistake to let the programs we primarily use to view text and images become bloated virtual machines that execute megabytes of arbitrary code with every page load.

  • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    If it goes… I don’t know what I’ll do.

    Go out and touch grass probably.

    Get a hobby.

    Perfect my molotov recipe.

    • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I’m not so sure about that, Ublock is the reason I use Firefox, and I don’t think I’m alone in that. And I’m pretty sure they know that.

  • Imhereforfun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    A misleading title shilling for Firefox. Brave has full support and it won’t even remove it nor does it actually need it as it has its own in-house fully hard coded adblock that doesn’t need Google services whatsoever.

    • Jiral@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Not entirely correct. When we look at engines there are Blink, gecko and webkit. Unless you also count Ladybird’s engine I guess.

      Yes Blink is a webkit fork but it has been separate for a good while.

      Isn’t it crazy that Safari and thereby also Chrome/Chromium are at the heart based on work by KDE for its Konqueror?

  • TWeaK@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Alternate headline: Firefox is now the only browser worth using.

    And in any case, lumping Firefox as one browser is disingenuous. There are numerous Firefox forks, just like every other major browser is in fact a Google Chromium fork.

  • Mio@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 hours ago

    We should introduce Manifest V4 that would undo all damage V3 did.

  • Victoria@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    If they ever stop supporting it I will continue to use the last version to support it, any website that breaks compatibility with this Firefox version can get fucked.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s a significant security risk, unfortunately.

      If that happens, I’d suggest a fork with a built in blocker, one that still gets security patches from upstream Firefox.

      • St.Elsewhere@threads.net@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Exactly. Ublock origin is notable only for being part of 0 ad companies and 100% trustworthy. The blocking lists are universal. If it’s built into the browser, you’re golden

        • ruby@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          i mean… blocking lists are universal, but the other features ublock offers are not - i’m making heavy use of ublock’s dynamic filtering panel and per-site switches. one important thing i use ublock for is to whitelist which sites get javascript permissions and to get rid of remote fonts to make pages more readable. those features need manifest v2.

          if firefox drops manifest v2 and you’re relying purely on those inbuilt blocking lists then you might as well use the manifest v3 version of ublock without seeing a difference, right?

        • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Well…

          With a fork, one is very dependent on the browser dev. Not just on their benevolence, but on their security practices too. And on them pulling in upstream security patches, quickly.

          TBH, this is why I do finance stuff on vanilla Firefox. I love browser forks, I really do, but I’m a bit more cautious with them, too.

            • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              True, sometimes. But they don’t have the sheer manpower dedicated to security that Mozilla has, nor the institutional policies that try to mitigate losing a key/account or something like that. Also, technically, vanilla Firefox is first to get the zero-day patches before they filter downstream.

              Not that the forks are dangerous or anything, generally.

  • nullspace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I can’t imagine using the web without firefox and ublock. Even the cookie consent popups are awful.

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Ublock Lite still works in Chrome (and it still blocks YouTube ads, not sure about cookie popups), but you get no control over the filters. Just a slider with some presets to choose from. So while better than nothing, just stick with Firefox.

        • woelkchen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Pretty sure I’ve read months ago that the maintainers said they’ll try to support it as long as possible but at the moment v2 support is removed from the source code, they’ll won’t have the resources to add it back again.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 hours ago

      If only that were true. To many people are addicted to google to ever give up chrome/chromium without a series of catastrophic fuckups from google.

      • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Dude, the last thing I use Google for is YouTube and the ads are so much now on my tv and when listening to stories in my car that I’m seriously considering either paying for nebula or just snorting whatever I find under the sink for amusement.

        • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          17 hours ago

          i forget what its called… pihole? You can set up a small box on your network that can filter out ads on devices that you cant install adblocking on, like on your TV and stuff.