• thefloweracidic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I can’t remember where I heard this or of it is true, but apparently it would have cost significantly more money to deceive the public with a fake moon landing than it would have been to fund the mission. When I think about the effort they would have put behind this ruse it makes sense as I’m sure the media was all over the event and the fakery wouldn’t have been isolated to a single broadcast.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Now imagine how CGI was when they flew to the moon in 1969!

    The best argument against the moon landings being fake is the sheer amount of people involved in the Apollo project. Estimates go up to 400’000 people (with different levels of involvement). If it had all been fake, someone would have blabbed by now.

    • thefloweracidic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      16 hours ago

      One of my favorite quotes is “The only way three people can keep a secret is if two of them are dead”, from some random western movie, but yes people love to blab.

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        And you cannot deny the truth of that statement. I know that quote differently, btw: “Two can keep a secret, if one of them us dead.”, and I think that was from “Yes, Minister!” 😃

    • Zron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Actually the best argument would be that the Soviets didn’t raise holy hell about it being fake.

      Apollo 11 was able to be tracked by radio the entire trip to the moon. The radio transmissions and The television broadcast was unencrypted over plain radio. I’m sure the Soviets were able to verify the entire mission in real time. If there was even a hint that the moon landing was fake, the Soviets would have been throwing it in the US’s face the instant it happened.

      • kossa@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        20 hours ago

        You don’t think your conspiracies big enough. Obviously the Soviet Union was in on it, something, something New World Order. Nobody knows what’s to be gained for whom, but that is what conspiracy theories are made of.

        • GladiusB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          19 hours ago

          This kills me the most. Most nations can’t agree on taxes or land boundaries or hundreds of other things, but they agree on space. Sure. That tracks.

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I remember when I was in kindergarten and the teacher was cool for reminding us that Beast Wars is coming up soon in couple of hours, so we could have something to look forward to going home!

    • quarkquasar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I used to watch it bleary-eyed af in the mornings before school in order to stay awake and not miss the bus.

  • kamen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    23 hours ago

    The Moon landing was staged, but Kubrick insisted on shooting on location.

  • Tiral@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I don’t think it was fake at all, but I don’t think I’ve ever heard a denier say it was cgi. They say it’s a stage.

  • The Mop Lord@moplemmy.fyi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    135
    ·
    2 days ago

    I heard they got Stanley Kubrick to fake the landing, but he was such a stickler for accuracy he got them to actually go to the moon to film it.

    • jaybone@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m not sure how he was in 1969(?) but by the time he made Full Metal Jacket in the 1980s(?) he was so afraid of flying, he had palm trees brought in to England rather than shoot on location in Vietnam. Which is why all the palm trees in that movie look dead as hell. So I’m guessing he would not have gone to the moon, but would have had moon craters brought to him. Which means someone would have had to go to the moon to get them. Therefore, we went to the moon. Checkmate atheists.

      • mobyduck648@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Which is why all the palm trees in that movie look dead as hell.

        Should have waited a few decades, after this summer I’m sure Britain can support palm trees!

  • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 day ago

    Opinions of the guy aside, I recall it was Neil DeGrasse Tyson who made the argument that it simply is cheaper and easier to go to the moon than to fake it and maintain the coverup.

    Like, we can’t keep secrets for shit, but that’s the one that stays kept?

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      They are already claiming that the Artemis mission was fake due to cuts between the camera shots on the livestream ಥ_ಥ

      • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        but artemis was fake. it didn’t grow on a tree. we had to build it.

        unless someone can show me a damn rocket what goes to the moon tree

    • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      The whole thing was a PR exercise to get one over on the Russians. Why not spend 5% more for a backup strategy to “document” the event

  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    They wanted to fake a moon landing and after analyzing cost they concluded that the cheapest option was to film on location.

    • TrooBloo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Jurassic Park came out in 1993 (can’t help but use this as a point of reference), but this does look consistent with lower budget stuff, like that Canadian cartoon Reboot. Anyone else remember that one?