I was once talking with one of my classmates and he said that in the future, there will be universal basic income implemented by entire world. I was not convinced at that time and thought he is just being stupid but given the layoffs happening and massive amount of unemployment, I am thinking about this possibility. What do you say?

  • vogi@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I read Utopia for Realists earlier this year. A big portion of it is about UBI and is a great read for anybody new to this topic. The thing that surprised me the most is that we were fairly close in the USA in having something similar, this was under Nixon. UBI seems to not really be that left of an idea as i assumed it was. If you are too poor you are effectively costing the country more money than it would cost to just help those to be able to work/spend money themselves.

    In my city there was a citizen initiative to have a test run last year, but sadly opposing parties ran a disinformation campaign against it. Saying we already have enough studies that show its not worth it. (Which is a flat out lie, but I guess you can interpret studies as you wish). Most people fell for it. I think for politicians its just too easy to have big enough portion of people uneducated and too busy with their 9-5 jobs so they do not realize how they are being taken advantage off.

    EDIT: I do think though that one form of UBI is the future as well, its just a matter of when. But I might also be too much of an optimist. Or maybe we could also just get rid of advertisement that would work as well. Splitting the real work thats then left to do.

  • FluidBeef@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    7 days ago

    The billionaires would have to fund it, and I don’t believe for a second they wouldn’t leave us all to starve.

  • shirro@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    The rich have done everything they can to increase wealth inequality and brainwash the public into acceptance. That will not be reversed. If they allow UBI it will be below poverty levels and highly conditional.

    The wealthy want slaves. Its a mental illness with them. Black people. Underage sex trafficking. Working poor. Robots. Last thing they want is a utopia where everyone is healthy, happy and financially independent.

    One of the wealthiest countries in the world doesn’t even have proper healthcare system in 2026. No way are those dumb fucks getting a UBI. Its a lie.

  • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    UBI is the future if we are allowed peace.

    WW3 in an apocalyptic scale is much more likely. Don’t need to feed the obsolete peasants if they’re all dead.

  • AAA@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    Yes, but not in the way we envision it.

    Wealth inequality will increase. Drastically. There will be a small group of people owning basically everything. But they still need cheap labor and subjects, plus someone needs to consume their products. Because jobs will be limited UBI will be implemented: as a baseline to keep us alive, not as a tool for general prosperity.

    Watch “Elysium” how this bleak world may look. It’s not a great movie, but has that “everyone but a few people is super fucked”-theme locked down.

  • gabelstapler@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 days ago

    No. Once the people have the time and leisure to think and mingle they might find out who the real source of the problem is. So it’s better to keep your slaves busy and struggling to keep the roof over their head and their belly not empty.

  • AndyMFK@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    Yes, but only because your question implies there is a future for humanity, and I believe UBI is realistically one of the few ways humanity even gets a future

    • Naive@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yeah, I even feel skeptical of humanity having future. Global warming and how we are fucking our environment can cause our end to fall upon us too quickly.

  • Almacca@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 days ago

    I think it’s absolutely necessary as stop-gap on the way to a truly post-scarcity society where money is irrelevant, but highly unlikely because greedy cunts run everything.

  • mitch404@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    It will never happen.

    Not because it is a bad idea; it is an AWESOME idea. Work used to be something you do for the collectivity; you do something for the group, in exchange of something from the group. Today, a work is a mean to earn money, regardless of the collectivity. We do meaningless jobs, which often gives nothing to the collectivity, just because we have a rent to pay, we want vacations and a new car. A universal basic income would completely break this; I would work to bring something to the group, not to reach a stupid objective for the company.

    However, there is a fringe of people which will not gain anything from this, even lose leverage and power over the masses: the 1%, the millionaires and billionaires. They will do whatever they can to kill it, saying only freeloaders and foreigners will benefits from it. And the masses will vote against it, and it will be a big victory for capitalism. Until global warming accelerate, we will have nothing to eat anymore and earth will be inhospitable for humans. The end.

  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    To be honest I’m not fan of UBI. I’m more fond of redistribution of work.

    If there’s less things to do due to automatization let’s just all work less hours with full income.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      I think ubi would do that

      People have a baseline income and can work less or maybe even not at all if noy necessary. Those that really want more can work and earn more then

      I think it will be very important for that to work that we first put wealth caps. Nobody should be able to have a net worth that is an X amount. Anything above that should be taxed 100%. Say, 10 million for example, nice upper limit.

      If all the nasocs are covered, free healthcare, free education, UBI, wealth caps, I think we’d live in a near utopia

    • gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      i’m just gonna say it: your assumption that everybody should work is harmful. there’s lots of people who can’t work for medical reasons, but can’t get a doctor’s note either. for example, psychological syndromes are notoriously hard to diagnose.

      you’d just create another point of social friction with your attitude.

  • whereitsat@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    no lol.

    have you ever met a rich person? like a real rich person? they’re arrogant and snobby and think the rest of us have no right to exist. there’s a reason there’s this massive push to implement AI. part of it is to save money but the other part of it is that they legit think that we’re all lesser and AI replacing call centers and fast food jobs will hasten our departure.

    we’ll all end up being thrown in a volcano before they implement UBI.

    i’d say asia has more of a chance in the long run just because social responsibility is part of culture and that can often act as an antidote to the worst parts of capitalism. south korea can be gross but at least they throw their corrupt leaders in jail…

    no chance of this happening in the states.

      • sportsjorts@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yes. They are fucking insufferable assholes who think they are God’s gifts to the earth. I’ve meet oodles and I can count a handful that weren’t absolute shit or total idiots. Eat the rich.

        • Naive@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Damn. Money really has something in it. More you have it, more you lose your humanity.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      have you ever met a rich person? like a real rich person?

      Yes. The one I got to know best is fine, you wouldn’t even know.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          More like 30 million. Not sure about the other two I know less well, but one has private jets, and the other has a Grammy.

          They tend to believe things that are convenient for rich people to believe, just like my own stratum does for our own sake, and stratums below that do as well. But, on a personality level, they’re the same damn humans as everyone else.

            • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 days ago

              If you’re just basing that on the wealth figure I gave, that’s circular logic. They’re a dick because they’re wealthy, so the wealthy are dicks.

              If it’s the second paragraph, the Lemmy “upper middle class” worldview grates way more, because it’s actively hypocritical. You said 2 million. People here are not poor or uneducated, and I’m guessing some have or have that coming to them. Most of the rest have more than 0, which is about the actual median.

              Guess what! Kind-of-rich people collectively own most of the capital, and yet everyone thinks they’re the proletarian vanguard.

  • Stern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    UBI has to have a lot of folks wanting it and theres contingents that would rather starve then see those people get a thin dime, with “those people” having various meanings. Then there’s the temporarily embarassed millionaires, and of course the Fox news crew who think socio-commu-trans folk are going to dye their kids hair blue and make them worship Satan.

  • weeeeum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    No because corps and oligarchs will campaign against it, inexplicably win, and destroy one of the country’s greatest achievements with cheers and applause

    Its cynical, but its happened to many social programs thay way.